Deepsolv Blog
Deepsolv Blog
Backed by



















Creative Decision Intelligence for Meta growth teams. Know what to test next — before you spend on it.
Follow Deepsolv on InstagramFollow Deepsolv on LinkedInFollow Deepsolv on TwitterAll rights reserved © 2026 deepsolv.ai
7 min read
Published: 3/25/2026

Creating Facebook ads manually used to be viable. Research a few competitors. Write some copy. Launch a handful of creatives. See what sticks.
That approach is no longer competitive.
Meta CPMs have risen sharply over the past three years. The cost of testing a bad creative concept has increased in proportion. At the same time, creative fatigue is accelerating. Audiences on Meta and Instagram cycle through ads faster than before. A creative that performs well in January may be exhausted by March.
The result is a volume problem. To stay competitive, teams need more creative. But more creative without better inputs just means more waste at scale.
Research from Meta consistently shows that creative is now the number one variable in Facebook ad performance, ahead of targeting, placement, and bidding strategy. The implication is clear. If you want better results, you need a better creative process.
AI can significantly improve that process. But only if it is used in the right order.
Most teams skip this step. They open a blank document, write some copy, and launch.
The teams that consistently produce winning creative do the opposite. They start by understanding what is already working in their category. That means knowing which competitor ads have been running for 60+ days (a reliable proxy for profitability), which hooks and formats keep appearing across multiple brands, and which offers are being actively scaled.
Two tools give you this information for free.
The Meta Ad Library is the starting point. You can search for any advertiser, filter by platform, country, and media type, and sort by impression volume. It is free and shows every active Meta ad. The limitation is that it requires manual monitoring. You have to check it regularly, and deleted ads disappear permanently.
Adam by Deepsolv automates this step. It monitors your competitor set continuously, surfaces winning patterns across your category, and alerts you when something new is being scaled. For teams running Meta ads seriously, this turns a 3-hour weekly research task into a few minutes of review.
For a detailed walkthrough of the Meta Ad Library, see our guide on how to use the Facebook Ads Library to improve your campaigns.
This is the step that determines whether your AI-generated ads are good or mediocre.
A creative brief captures everything a designer, videographer, or copywriter needs to produce an ad that is likely to work. It includes:
The difference between a brief that produces a winning ad and one that produces a generic ad is the quality of the research that went into it. If your brief is built from competitive intelligence and performance data, your AI-generated copy and visuals will have real strategic direction. If your brief is just "write a Facebook ad for [product]", the output will be generic.
Adam generates structured briefs directly from competitive data. The research step and the brief step become one workflow.
If you're using AI tools like ChatGPT or Claude for this step, the quality of your prompts depends entirely on how well you've structured your competitive insights. Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of how to use ChatGPT for competitor ad analysis and Claude AI for extracting ad insights, which you can directly convert into high-performing creative briefs.
With a strong brief in hand, this step goes faster and produces better results.
For static images, Midjourney and Adobe Firefly are the current standard for quality. Midjourney excels at photorealistic and stylised visuals. Firefly integrates directly into Adobe products and handles commercial licensing cleanly.
For video, Runway and Pika are leading tools. Runway is stronger on cinematic quality and motion control. Pika is faster for quick-turn iterations.
A note on UGC-style ads. AI video tools are increasingly capable of producing content that looks like authentic user-generated content. This is one of the highest-performing formats on Meta right now. Tools like HeyGen can generate spokesperson-style video from a script.
The brief you built in Step 2 directly informs the prompts you use in these tools. Instead of a vague image prompt, you have a specific visual direction: "30-second UGC-style video, female founder in kitchen, taste-test format, opening line: 'I stopped buying protein bars after I tried this.'"
AI copy tools have improved significantly. But the quality of the output still depends almost entirely on the quality of the input.
"Write me a Facebook ad for a protein bar brand" produces generic output.
"Write primary text for a Facebook ad targeting female fitness enthusiasts aged 25–40. Hook: bold claim. Offer: 20% off first order. Tone: direct, no fluff. The ad is for a clean-ingredient protein bar. Landing page headline is 'Real ingredients. Real results.' Match the energy." produces something a human creative director might actually use.
Claude, ChatGPT, and Jasper are all capable copy tools. The differentiator is not the tool. It is the brief you give it.
A few formats that consistently perform on Meta:
Run 2–3 copy variations per brief. Test one variable at a time.
Publishing AI-generated ads is not the end of the workflow. It is the beginning of the feedback loop.
A structured testing framework prevents two common mistakes. The first is changing too many variables at once, which makes it impossible to know what drove a result. The second is killing ads too early, before Meta's algorithm has had enough data to optimise delivery.
Basic testing principles:
Over time, this documentation becomes a proprietary knowledge base. You accumulate evidence about what works for your specific audience. That evidence feeds back into better briefs, better AI prompts, and better creative decisions.
AI tools like Adam can help close this loop by correlating your ad performance data with the creative elements that drove results. Instead of reviewing your ad account manually, you get a pattern-level view of what is working.
Skipping competitive research and going straight to production.
This is the most common mistake. AI tools are fast. It is tempting to skip the research phase and go directly to generation. But without competitive intelligence as an input, AI produces generic creative that looks like everything else in the category.
Over-producing variations before testing.
AI makes it easy to generate 50 ad variations in an afternoon. Running all of them at once fragments your budget and makes it impossible to draw meaningful conclusions. Start with 3–5 variations per campaign, test systematically, and scale what wins.
Using AI copy without a human review.
AI copy tools can produce off-brand language, inaccurate claims, or tone that does not match your brand voice. Always have a human review before publishing. This is especially important for product claims, pricing, and anything that touches regulatory considerations.
Ignoring the landing page.
The ad is only half the conversion. A high-performing ad that lands on a misaligned page will not convert. Your brief should capture what the landing page says and ensure the ad's hook and offer match the landing page headline and CTA.
| Tool | Best For | Cost |
| Adam by Deepsolv | Competitive research + brief generation | Free trial available |
| Midjourney | High-quality static image generation | From $10/month |
| Runway | AI video production | From $12/month |
| Adobe Firefly | Commercially licensed AI images | Included in Adobe CC |
| Claude / ChatGPT | Ad copy and headline generation | Free tier available |
| Jasper | Marketing-specific copy generation | From $49/month |
| HeyGen | AI spokesperson and UGC-style video | From $29/month |
FAQs
Frequently asked questions related to this blog post